Fri05242013

Last update11:54:39 PM GMT

Let’s Shoot for the Moon

  • PDF
User Rating: / 29
PoorBest 

As American jobs are outsourced, consider a new paradigm that celebrates mastery of skills and innovation.

Problem

As the world becomes more and more connected, many American workers—both blue- and white-collar—have watched their jobs migrate outside our borders.

Many nations in Far East Asia and other parts of the world are willing to work just as hard as Americans for a lot less.Today, our manufacturing industry is a far cry from the golden ages of industrial revolution.

Outsourcing Escalates

Unfortunately, this trend is now targeting highly professional jobs as well. I know an American radiology professional association that outsources the initial interpretation and diagnosis of medical images, obtained by contracting U.S. hospitals during graveyard shifts, to India. That time period is least desirable for American radiologists because it deprives them of a good night sleep. The same time slot is, however, ideal for local time zones in India. Images are sent to radiologists in India via secure high speed Internet. These non-American radiologists study the images in great detail. They then interpret them and send their findings to an American licensed radiologist, who briefly reviews them and then forms his diagnosis. Hospitals prefer this new approach because these diagnoses cost them considerably less. In addition, since two radiologists review the images, there is a reduced risk of errors.

Hard Facts

According to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2011 only 68 percent of high school senior graduates enrolled in either two- or four-year colleges or universities. That does not take into account the 1.3 million seniors who fail to earn their high school diploma each year. Among those who enter a four-year college, only 53 percent graduate within six years. One might think the U.S. needs to spend more on education. Unfortunately statistics suggest otherwise. In total, the U.S. spends close to a trillion dollars on education (USC Rossier - February 2011). We spend more on education than the next top ten countries combined! American taxpayers invest over $91,000 per student between the ages of six and fifteen (George Mason University - December, 2010).

Access to good education is not the problem either. Nineteen of the top Universities in the world are in the United States. Yet, American students rank 25th in math and 21st in science, compared to students in top 30 industrialized countries. These statistics are very discouraging and are telltale signs that we are on the wrong path.

Solving the Problem

Albert Einstein said, “We can't solve today’s problems with the same kind of thinking we used when we first created them.” We must go back to the drawing board and reassess our approach. We must supply our pupils with more fertile soil so they can flourish in their chosen field of interest. We should select teachers that are in love with learning, exploring, and inventing themselves. After all, one can only preach what one practices. We must create an atmosphere that provides students with easy access to eager sponsors who would get compensated only if their apprentice achieves mastership.

Utilizing a Proven Strategy

I suggest we utilize a strategy that has worked for performing arts and sports for nearly half a century. I call this strategy, shooting for the moon. Basically, no one gets rewarded for being a mediocre actor or athlete. But if one masters the art, they are showered with wealth, prosperity, and national recognition in grand fashion (i.e. the Academy Awards, Super Bowl, etc.). Their trainers and coaches also get rewarded and recognition only if they produce winners. For example, NBA basketball players have learned to dunk the ball so amazingly because they know mastery in that field is equivalent to winning the lottery. Young athletes practice countless hours to win NBA slam-dunk competitions. What if we provided a similar platform for science and math in a scale much larger than the Noble prize and more glamorous than the Oscars?

Developing Future Steve Jobs and Jack Welches

This system must also promote big thinking and relentless pursuit of what others consider impossible. Such national recognition and mega-million dollar rewards can systemically breed people like Steve Jobs. He proved, if we focus on making innovative products and good quality, people don't mind paying top dollar. Such mentality made Apple the most profitable corporation in the world. This year, it even surpassed giants such as Exxon-Mobile and Boeing.

When Jack Welch took over at General Electric in 1980, he introduced a new policy. He proposed that each year the top 25 percent get rewarded immensely, the middle 50 percent get coached to do better, and the bottom 25 percent get fired. He also proposed that GE get into other ventures, so long as it ranks either first or second in that field. If they could not do so, he would sell and get out. His “take no hostages” approach took GE from an appliance manufacturing company facing bankruptcy to the largest corporation in the world during the 1990s with over 300,000 employees worldwide.

Still Ahead but Losing Ground:

Economically and technologically, the United States is still far ahead of the pack. But, the competition is gaining on us. Before long we might find ourselves playing catch up to other nations. Previous generations were able to maintain an upper middle class life style with average skill level and good work ethics. Today, however, that American Dream and promise is no longer valid. For the first time ever, our children are not expected to do better—or even as well as their parents with the similar skill levels. We are certainly not in Kansas anymore.

Paradigm Shift:

In order to turn things around we must adapt a new paradigm that celebrates mastery of skills and innovation. We must offer annual competition and huge monetary prizes (in tens of millions) to those who achieve excellence in key fields. We must not accept or compensate mediocrity. After all, no mountain climber gets recognized or rewarded for almost making it to the top.

Comments  

 
+1 #6 Sandra Rupp 2012-06-07 14:26
I like idea of investing in what people are great in. In addition to Steve Jobs & Jack Welch, we need more Anita Roddicks too!
Quote
 
 
+2 #5 Bob C 2012-06-07 13:05
I completely agree with you that exponential reward system is far more effective in promoting excellence and innovative thinking than reward for achieving minimum required standard. Very nice blog post! I'll be following your writings :)
Quote
 
 
+5 #4 Kim Garst 2012-06-05 20:04
Love this statement as I totally believe it to be true and it's been proven as per your Apple example "if we focus on making innovative products and good quality, people don't mind paying top dollar."
Quote
 
 
+2 #3 Adam 2012-06-04 22:13
This article is great, I really get what is meant by the mastery of a skill since I am a martial artist for years. At the early stage you cant do it, then you can but its only the beginning of the cycle. In martial arts especially knowing that you know nothing is the only way to advance. Hopefully I'll master it before I am 70 :)
Quote
 
 
+2 #2 Matt 2012-06-04 22:10
I learned something new. I’m very impatient when it comes to learning a new skill. This blog made me realize that I need to adapt a new paradigm.
Quote
 
 
+4 #1 Jane 2012-06-04 21:09
After being unemployed for over a year I finally went back to school to earn my Masters degree in Communications. I received 3 job offer before finishing the program. I am back to work and earn a better salary than before. You are certainly right about that. Great post!
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Change - Jan 2013

Change - Feb 2013

Change - Mar 2013

Change - Apr 2013

View Past Issues

 

Book Reviews

A Perfect Gift for Every Husband

How to Speak Womanese is intended to guide men through the emotional complexity of a woman's world. This book provides playful distinctions that will promote uncommon conversations and openings for what's possible in the untamed territory of woman to man communication.